CA-125
What Does This Test Mean to You?
by Thomas J. Herzog, MD, and Robert L. Coleman, MD
Women who are suspected of having ovarian cancer and women who have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer often receive a blood test to measure their CA-125 level. CA-125 is a substance found in the blood called a glycoprotein (a sugar-associated protein). It is commonly referred to as a biomarker or tumor marker because it provides information about the biological state of a disease (ovarian cancer) and is obtained by a blood sample from which a level can be measured. But it is more accurately considered a tumor associated protein because elevated CA-125 levels do not always indicate ovarian cancer, and levels can be misleading.
The current CA-125 blood test is the second generation of the test that was first introduced in the early 1980s as a possible treatment. While researchers did not find a treatment, they did discover that blood levels of protein and antibody seemed to correlate with the status of the ovarian cancer. Closer investigation demonstrated that a CA-125 level of 35 units was found to be a useful cutoff point, with 99 percent of healthy women having values below this level.
The CA-125 test is most reliable and useful for the detection of recurrent disease in women previously diagnosed and treated for ovarian cancer.
How the CA-125 Test is Used in the
Care of Women with Ovarian Cancer
The CA-125 test is used in a variety of
situations during the course of the diagnosis,
treatment, and follow-up care of
ovarian and other closely related cancers,
such as primary peritoneal and fallopian
tube cancers. Four primary roles for
CA-125 assessment have been established
with varying degrees of clinical
use and reliability:
To Inform Outcome
Several studies
have linked the value of CA-125 to both
short-term and long-term outcomes. The
range of these investigations is a tribute
to the value the test has in this disease
and includes the likelihood initial surgery
will be “optimal,” the likelihood
all disease will be gone at first evaluation,
the duration of survival or time
until the tumor could recur, and the
response to modalities of therapy, such
as maintenance therapy. Unfortunately,
these represent population trends and,
individually, appear to be of less value.
Dr. Robert Coleman
To Detect Recurrent Disease
The
CA-125 test is most reliable and useful
for the detection of recurrent disease in
women previously diagnosed and treated
for ovarian cancer. While there are certainly
exceptions to this statement,
generally, rising numbers over a series
of tests strongly suggest that a woman
is experiencing a recurrence. This may
be true even if the values are within the
normal range, particularly if the CA-125
has been elevated in the past when disease
was present. However, some
women develop a recurrence without
a rising CA-125 level. On the other
hand, some women have a modest rise
in the value but never develop recurrent
disease.
To Monitor Treatment
The CA-125
test is a reliable tool to use along with a
thorough history and physical exam to
monitor treatment. However, its usefulness
in this case depends on the starting
value. Monitoring treatment results is
most accurate when women have an elevated
initial CA-125 value. It is vital
to stress that this test represents just a
piece of the puzzle and a number of other
factors are considered in determining
whether any given therapy is effective.
To Screen for Ovarian Cancer
As is
the case with most cancers, early detection
of ovarian cancers leads to a higher
cure rate. There is not yet a highly effective
screening test for ovarian cancer,
and because the
symptoms for
this cancer are
variable, many
women currently
are diagnosed
at a later stage.
Unfortunately,
the CA-125 test,
in isolation, has
proven to be
ineffective in
screening for ovarian cancer. However,
research is ongoing to look at other possibilities
for ovarian cancer screening,
including the use of a “cocktail” or panel
of new markers in concert with CA-125.
We urge women diagnosed with ovarian cancer to try to keep in mind that the CA-125 test is only one indication of how well the treatment is working. Many other variables need to be considered, and the applications of CA-125 values need to be individualized. Talk to your doctor if you have questions about the CA-125 test.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
Dr. Thomas Herzog is professor of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology at Columbia University and director of the division of Gynecologic Oncology at the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center in New York, NY. Dr. Robert Coleman is director of clinical research in the department of Gynecologic Oncology at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, TX.
This article was published in Coping® with Cancer magazine, September/October 2009.


